Ureterorenoscopic treatment of ureteral stones – influence of operator’s experience and skill on the procedure outcome

نویسندگان

  • Davor Librenjak
  • Marijan Šitum
  • Dijana Gugić
  • Kazimir Milostić
  • Mario Duvnjak
چکیده

AIM To observe the influence of operating urologist's education and adopted skills on the outcome of ureterorenoscopy treatment of ureteral stones. METHODS The study included 422 patients (234 men, 55.4%) who underwent ureterorenoscopy to treat ureteral stones at the Urology Department of Clinical Hospital Center Split, Croatia, between 2001 and 2009. All interventions were carried out with a semi-rigid Wolf ureteroscope and an electropneumatic generator used for lithotripsy. The operating specialists were divided into two groups. The first group included 4 urologists who had started learning and performing endoscopic procedures at the beginning of their specialization and the second group included 4 urologists who had started performing endoscopic procedures later in their careers, on average more than 5 years after specialization. RESULTS Radiology tests confirmed that 87% (208/238) of stones were completely removed from the distal ureter, 54% (66/123) from the middle ureter, and 46% (28/61) from the proximal ureter. The first group of urologists completed significantly more procedures successfully, especially for the stones in the distal (95% vs 74%; P = 0.001) and middle ureter (66% vs 38%; P = 0.002), and their patients spent less time in the hospital postoperatively. CONCLUSION Urologists who started learning and performing endoscopic procedures at the beginning of their specialization are more successful in performing ureteroscopy. It is important that young specialists receive timely and systematic education and cooperate with more experienced colleagues.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

PREFERENCE-BASED ASSESSMENT Patient Utility Measurement for Managing Ureteral Stones: A Modified Standard Gamble Approach

Objectives: To measure the utility of patients with ureteral stones under various medical regimes and to identify significant factors affecting utility for various health states. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted to measure the utility of 89 patients on each health state related to the clinical management of ureteral stones. Health states with respect to intervention and treatment...

متن کامل

بررسی تاثیر داروی تامسولوسین در درمان طبی سنگ‌های دیستال حالب

  M Alizade [1] , MD MR Mohammadi Fallah [2] , MD M Shokoohi [3] , MD AH Sharafi [4] , MDM Maghsudi [5] , MD    Received: 23 Dec, 2007 Accepted: 12 April, 2008 Abstract  Background &Aims : Impacted distal ureteral stone have always been controversial on the choice of treatment. This study aims to evaluate the effect of tamsulosin (non selective alpha 1-blocker) in medical expulsion therapy of d...

متن کامل

ANTEGRADE URETEROSCOPY FOR REMOVAL OFU RETERAL STONES

30 cases of obstructing proximal ureteral stones at the level of L3-L5 which could not be pushed back into the pelvis and passed by a guide wire under epidural anesthesia, were removed percutaneously with the rigid ureteroscope. Multiple stones in one ureter, bilateral ureteral stones and a ureteral stone of a solitary kidney were removed successfully in one session showing the reliability...

متن کامل

آیا اوروگرافی ترشحی بر سونوگرافی برای تشخیص سنگ های حالب ارجحیت دارد؟

Background and purpose: Çlinical symptoms of obstructive ureteral stones are very disturbing. Ïnfection, hematuria and renal insufficiency are its complications. Ïn the recent decades ÏVP has been a selective standard method in diagnosis of the causes of ureteral colic. But in many cases there are contraindications and limitations in this procedure. The aim of this study was to determine t...

متن کامل

TRANS URETERAL LITHOTRIPSY

From Sep. 1984 to Aug. 1990,99 patients were treated for ureteral stone using the urekroscope. In five patients ureteroscopy was repeated for a second stone. In one patient the procedure was diagnostic in nature and in the rest of the patients it had a curative value. In 60 patients the stone was removed by electrohydraulic and basket combination and in25 cases, dilatation alone was enough...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 52  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011